A philosophy department within the Faculty of Science, this entity develops reflections on the epistemological, ethical, social, political and cultural issues of science and technology.
Teaching by members of the department takes place mainly in the Faculties of Science and Medicine, and covers philosophy of science, epistemology, logic, philosophy of medicine, bioethics and social and political ethics. The aim is to initiate students to develop critical reflection on their scientific discipline and on the relationship between science and society.
The 4 pillars of teaching and research
1. Philosophy of science
2. Ethics of health care
3. Human development, social justice, interculturality
4. Philosophy of medicine
Find out more about the Science, Philosophy and Society Department
Spotlight
Agenda
Mistrust of science
The SPiN research center invites you to its inaugural event.
For its inaugural conference, the SPiN (Science & Philosophy in Namur) center will be joined by Claire Rommelaere, a lawyer and researcher at the Center for Bioethics at the University of Namur, and Aude Bandini, a philosopher of science at the University of Montreal, to take a critical look at the theme of "distrust of science." The urgency of addressing this issue is clear in our era, where, despite an overall stable level of trust in science, the parameters of public debate are frequently blurred by misinformation.
Having had the opportunity to observe philosophers of science in their natural habitat for nearly fifteen years, Claire Rommelaere will share her thoughts on whether or not we should trust those who think about science.
For her part, Aude Bandini will address a major problem that we all face at a time when the mass of available knowledge is such that it is impossible to acquire it on our own. Indeed, the socially distributed nature of knowledge generally leaves us no choice but to rely on the authority of experts, even on very important issues (such as health). However, when we rely on others in this way and follow recommendations that, due to our ignorance, we have no means of evaluating, we place ourselves in a relationship of "epistemic dependence" that conflicts with our aspirations for intellectual autonomy and forces us to ask ourselves a question whose answer may prove unbearable: is intellectual autonomy nothing more than a myth?
Conference hosted by journalist Maïté Warland.
Program:
- 5:30-6:30 p.m. | Drinks at Quai 22 (Rue du Séminaire 22, 5000 Namur)
- 6:30 p.m. | Claire Rommelaere
Distrust of philosophers of science - 7:00 p.m. | Aude Bandini Intellectual
autonomy in the face of scientific authority: a headache for social epistemology
Registration deadline: April 16.
Free of charge.
The Use of Analogy in Understanding Plant Life
Conference organized by the SPiN Research Center at the ESPHIN Institute.
A plant does not seem to have much in common with animals. Yet naturalists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries attempted to study plants as if they were animals: they set out, for example, to find an equivalent to the circulatory or respiratory systems. Why did they feel the need to resort to analogical reasoning? What results did they obtain? And more generally, what is the value of this type of reasoning?
On the agenda
Tuesday, May 5, 2026
12:15 PM – Welcome and light lunch
1:30 PM – Introductory remarks
Thibault De Meyer (University of Namur): Why Analogy?
2:15 PM – Session 1: Theory and Practice - Cristiana Oghina-Pavie (University of Angers): The analogy of pragmatic knowledge: actions and transactions in 19th-century horticulture and Quentin Hiernaux (FNRS / Free University of Brussels): The plant-animal analogy employed by A.-P. de Candolle’s physiology in addressing the issue of the sensitivity of living beings
3:45 PM – Coffee break
4:15 PM – Plenary Session 1 - Thierry Hoquet (University of Paris Nanterre): Is the plant/animal analogy valid?
5:45 PM – End of the first day
7:00 PM – Conference dinner
Wednesday, May 6, 2026
9:00 AM – Welcome
9:15 AM – Session 2: Relationships and Boundaries of the Living - Dario Galvão (University of Namur): Analogy and the Faculties of the Living: Animal Reason and Plant Sensibility in the Enlightenment and Ugo Batini (University of Poitiers): Understanding Humanity Through Plants: Analogy and the Metaphysics of the Living in Schopenhauer
10:45 AM – Coffee break
11:15 AM – Plenary Lecture 2 – Pascal Duris (University of Bordeaux): Plants as Humans. Analogy in Linnaeus and the Linneans
12:45 PM – Lunch break
2:00 PM – Toward New Disciplines - Vera Staetmanns (Ruhr University Bochum): Do Plants Think? Analogy in the Plant Psychology of Raoul Heinrich Francé (1874–1943) and Matthieu Amat (University of Rouen Normandy): Analogy and Homology: Transfers from the Life Sciences to the Cultural Sciences in the 19th Century
3:30 PM – Coffee break
4:00 PM – Plenary Session 3 - Aliènor Bertrand (CNRS / ENS de Lyon): “Les œufs du vent” and Their Descendants
5:30 PM – Closing of the conference
5:45 PM – End of the day
Contact: Dario Galvao - dario.galvao@unamur.be
The Department of Science, Philosophy and Society on video
Several videos explain the different research themes tackled in recent years.